Sujet : Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 11. Jul 2025, 06:12:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <104q6gf$1bcq0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/10/2025 11:42 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
On 2025-07-10 22:29, olcott wrote:
On 7/10/2025 10:58 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
On 2025-07-10 19:58, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/10/25 10:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>
According to the POE:
(a) The Moon is made of green cheese and
(b) the Moon does not exist
proves that
(c) Donald Trump is the Christ.
>
Rigth, but only because a side affect of (a) is that the moon must exist.
>
Really, the problem here is that Olcott fails to distinguish between the truth of a conditional statement and the truth of the consequent of a conditional statement. They are not the same thing.
>
((X & ~X) implies Y) is necessarily true.
>
>
That is not the exact meaning of these words
What is not the exact meaning of which words?
*This Wikipedia quote*
On 7/10/2025 11:29 PM, olcott wrote:
> the principle of explosion is the law according to which
> *any statement can be proven from a contradiction*
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosionHere is the exact meaning of:
*any statement can be proven from a contradiction*
∀x (⊥ ⊢ x).
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof
Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof