Sujet : Re: Title: A Structural Analysis of the Standard Halting Problem Proof
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 21. Jul 2025, 15:58:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <105lkj4$3v8t8$13@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/21/2025 9:40 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/21/2025 4:06 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-07-20 11:48:37 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 07:13:43 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:
[ .... ]
Your problem is you don't understand the meaning of the words you are
using.
This is an ad hominem attack, not argumentation.
It is also honest and truthful, which is not as common as it should.
It is also honest and truthful that people
that deny verified facts are either liars
or lack sufficient technical competence.
What you call "verified facts" are generally nothing of the kind. They
are merely things, often false, you would like to be true.
*One key example of a denied verified fact is when Joes said*
On 7/18/2025 3:49 AM, joes wrote:
> very obvious that HHH cannot simulate
> DDD past the call to HHH.
HHH(DDD) does emulate itself emulating DDD
After I have conclusively proven:
https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
You frequently deny verified facts. You "deny" established definitions.
It has been established on this newsgroup that you have lied on it.
That statement is libelous. No one can even point
to a false statement that I made, thus cannot point
to an intentionally false statement that I made.
Feel free to cut-and-paste a time/date stamped quote
of anything that I said that you have construed as false.
Several times it has become apparent that your technical programming
competence leaves a lot to be desired.
I did make one key mistake when referring to
lines-of-code versus statements in C.
Consistent honesty and truthfulness is what I have hoped for from you for
a long time, now. With it, we could have a productive exchange of views.
I doubt we will ever see this, though.
I would love to have this with you. I have initially
assessed that you may be very competent.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer