Re: Simple enough for every reader?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Simple enough for every reader?
De : ben (at) *nospam* bsb.me.uk (Ben Bacarisse)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 18. May 2025, 23:41:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <878qmt1qz6.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References : 1
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes:

Are you aware of the fact that in
>
{1}
{1, 2}
{1, 2, 3}
...
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
...
>
up to every n infinitely many natural numbers of the whole set
>
{1, 2, 3, ...}
>
are missing? Infinitely many of them will never be mentioned
individually. They are dark.

Presumably you are aware that for every n in ℕ, n will be mentioned in
infinitely many such sets?  They are bathed in light.

Do they still let you teach this stuff?

--
Ben.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 May 25 * Simple enough for every reader?39WM
18 May 25 +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?20Mikko
18 May 25 i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?18WM
18 May 25 i +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5Ross Finlayson
18 May 25 i i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4WM
19 May14:59 i i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
19 May19:56 i i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2WM
20 May08:17 i i   `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
19 May14:57 i `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?12Mikko
19 May19:53 i  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?11WM
20 May08:18 i   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10Mikko
20 May12:17 i    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9WM
22 May10:10 i     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8Mikko
22 May11:30 i      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7WM
23 May08:43 i       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?6Mikko
23 May09:31 i        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?5WM
24 May09:13 i         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?4Mikko
24 May12:29 i          `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
25 May11:42 i           `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Mikko
25 May12:38 i            `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
18 May23:41 `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?18Ben Bacarisse
19 May00:12  +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2olcott
19 May19:46  i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
19 May19:44  `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?15WM
20 May01:50   `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?14Ben Bacarisse
20 May08:22    +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
20 May12:15    i+- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM
21 May01:51    i`- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Ben Bacarisse
20 May12:11    `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?10WM
21 May02:17     `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?9Ben Bacarisse
21 May12:02      `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?8WM
23 May14:21       `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?7Ben Bacarisse
24 May09:18        +* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3Mikko
25 May02:09        i`* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ben Bacarisse
25 May11:43        i `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1Mikko
24 May11:50        `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?3WM
25 May02:27         `* Re: Simple enough for every reader?2Ben Bacarisse
25 May09:29          `- Re: Simple enough for every reader?1WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal