Sujet : Re: Linz's proofs.
De : news (at) *nospam* immibis.com (immibis)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 07. Mar 2024, 16:43:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uscjr5$13k1e$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/03/24 12:32, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
The students I taught seemed to have no problem with this sort of case
analysis. But the "assume H does X" argument lead to lots of "but H1
could be better" arguments.
They aren't satisfied with "we can do the exact same thing with H1 to prove that H1 doesn't work either"?
…