Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 3/14/24 12:32 PM, olcott wrote:The question posed to Ĥ.H has no correct answer, thus not theOn 3/14/2024 12:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Which isn;t the question at all, so you are just shown to be a stupid liar.On 3/13/24 4:04 PM, olcott wrote:>On 3/13/2024 5:43 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 3/13/24 2:54 PM, olcott wrote:>On 3/13/2024 4:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 3/13/24 1:52 PM, olcott wrote:I invented it so I get to stipulate its meaning.On 3/13/2024 12:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 3/13/24 10:08 AM, olcott wrote:>On 3/13/2024 11:44 AM, immibis wrote:>On 13/03/24 04:55, olcott wrote:>On 3/12/2024 10:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>>>
Not quite. It always gets the wrong answer, but only one of them for each quesiton.
>
They all gets the wrong answer on a whole class of questions
Wrong. You said. yourself. that H1 gets the right answer for D.
>
Since it is a logical impossibility to determine the truth
value of a self-contradictory expression the requirement
for H to do this is bogus.
Shows you are just a LIAR, as there IS a truth value to the expression that is the requirment for ANY SPECIFIC H.
>
*Lying about me being a liar may possibly cost your soul*
*Lying about me being a liar may possibly cost your soul*
*Lying about me being a liar may possibly cost your soul*
>
There is no mapping from H(D,D) to Halts(D,D) that exists.
This proves that H(D,D) is being asked an incorrect question.
>
Why, because it is NOT a LIE.
>
You don't even know the definiton of an incorrect question.
>
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.lang/c/AO5Vlupeelo/m/nxJy7N2vULwJ
Nope, common technical term.
>
Cite a source.
>>>>The fact that there DOES exist a mapping Halt(M,d) that maps all Turing Machines and there input to a result of Halting / Non-Halting for EVERY member of that input set, means tha Halts is a valid mapping to ask a decider to try to decider.That part is true.
>
Likewise when you ask a man that has never been married:
Have you stopped beating tour wife?
There are some men that have stopped beating their wife.
Right, because that question include a presumption of something not actually present.
>
Although there is a mapping from some men to YES/NO
there is no mapping from never unmarried men to YES/NO
thus the question is incorrect for all unmarried men.
>
Although there is a mapping from some TM/input pairs to YES/NO
there is no mapping from H/D to YES/NO
thus the question is incorrect for H/D
>
>
Except that the mapping requested is about the INPUTS to H, not H itsef.
>
In order to see that it is an incorrect question we must examine
the question in detail. Making sure to always ignore this key detail
<is> cheating.
>
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqy ∞ // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hq0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.Hqn // Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ does not halt
∀Ĥ.H (Ĥ.H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ != Halts(⟨Ĥ⟩, ⟨Ĥ⟩))
The QUESTION is:
Does the machine and input described by this input, Halt when run?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.