Re: Proof that H(D,D) meets its abort criteria

On 3/15/24 1:16 PM, olcott wrote:

To the best of my current knowledge all of your rebuttals
to this relied on counter-factual assumptions that cannot
possibly be supported with correct reasoning because they
are counter-factual.
 

Which is a meaningless subjective statement
Since you fail to ever point out an actual couter-factual assumption, this is just a statement of your own opinion, which has proved to be a VERY BAD predictor of reality.
This just shows that you are, in fact, just a pathological liar, as you refuse to evaluate what is actually true vs what you think is true.
This shows that you concept of "Correct Reasoning" is almost certainly a DEAD SUBJECT.
You are just admitting that you work is worthless and that you are not intereset in Honest Dialog, but just want to do your own Monolog and get annoyed that people are pointing out your errors.
If that is REALLY what you want to be know for, knock yourself out, we can just keep on piling on the proof that you are just the pathetic ignorant hypocritical pathological lying idiot that you show yourself to be.