Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?
De : polcott2 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 24. Mar 2024, 06:55:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utoboa$5f03$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?
01 int D(ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 void main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }
Of all of the elements of the set of H(D,D) where H simulates its
input there are matched pairs of otherwise identical elements that
only differ by whether they abort their simulation or not.
The half of these that don't abort are incorrect because all deciders
must halt. This makes the other half correct about the abort/no abort
decision.
I don't think an abort decider can be fooled by a pathological input.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 24 * Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?41olcott
24 Mar 24 +* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?38Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 24 i`* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?37olcott
25 Mar 24 i +* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?35Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 24 i i`* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?34olcott
25 Mar 24 i i `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?33Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 24 i i  `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?32olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   +* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?29Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i`* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?28olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   i `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?27Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i  `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?26olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   i   `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?25Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i    `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?24olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   i     `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?23Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i      `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?22olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   i       `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?21Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i        `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?20olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   i         `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?19Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i          `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?18olcott
26 Mar 24 i i   i           `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?17Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   i            `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?16olcott
27 Mar 24 i i   i             `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?15Richard Damon
27 Mar 24 i i   i              `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?14olcott
28 Mar 24 i i   i               `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?13Richard Damon
28 Mar 24 i i   i                `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?12olcott
28 Mar 24 i i   i                 `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?11Richard Damon
28 Mar 24 i i   i                  `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?10olcott
28 Mar 24 i i   i                   `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?9Richard Damon
28 Mar 24 i i   i                    `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?8olcott
29 Mar 24 i i   i                     `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?7Richard Damon
29 Mar 24 i i   i                      `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?6olcott
29 Mar 24 i i   i                       `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?5Richard Damon
29 Mar 24 i i   i                        `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?4olcott
29 Mar 24 i i   i                         `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?3Richard Damon
29 Mar 24 i i   i                          `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?2olcott
29 Mar 24 i i   i                           `- Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?1Richard Damon
26 Mar 24 i i   `* Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?2Fred. Zwarts
26 Mar 24 i i    `- Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?1olcott
26 Mar 24 i `- Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?1Richard Damon
24 Mar 24 +- Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?1Richard Damon
25 Mar 24 `- Re: Can an abort decider be defined that cannot be fooled by any pathological input?1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal