Sujet : Re: Can there be a truth without a truthmaker?
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 05. Apr 2024, 01:57:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uunepo$usff$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/4/2024 6:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 01:16:46 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 4/4/2024 12:54 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
So “truthmaker” is a matter of definition? A set of “axioms of truth”,
if you like?
>
Only for analytic truth-makers.
Is there some other kind?
There are only two kinds of truth:
(a) Analytic truth where expressions of language are true on the basis
of their meaning. Example: "All dogs are animals."
(b) Empirical truth, expressions of language that rely on sense data
from the sense organs. Example: "There is a dog in my living room right now."
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer