Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 08. May 2024, 21:36:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1gk7h$4imh$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/8/2024 6:39 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/8/24 12:03 AM, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2024 10:29 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2024 9:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/7/24 10:39 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2024 9:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/7/24 7:30 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/7/2024 5:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/7/24 1:31 PM, olcott wrote:
>
Once someone has definitely proven to not be telling the truth
about any specific point it is correct to assume any other
assertions about this same point are also false until evidence
arises to the contrary.
>
Then I guess we can just go and ignore everything you have said.
>
PERIOD.
>
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
*Below I prove that you are not telling the truth about this point*
>
Message-ID: <v0ummt$2qov3$2@i2pn2.org>
*When you interpret*
On 5/1/2024 7:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
 > On 5/1/24 11:51 AM, olcott wrote:
*Every D simulated by H that cannot possibly*
*stop running unless aborted by H*
>
as *D NEVER simulated by H*
>
you have shown a reckless disregard for the truth
that would win a defamation case.
>
Nope, It is clear you don't understand the logic of qualifiers.
>
>
*Prove it on this point*
Exactly how can ALWAYS: ∀x be construed as NEVER: ∄x
>
if there are no x.
>
>
00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }
>
The above template defines an infinite set of finite string H/D pairs where each D(D) that is simulated by H(D,D) also calls this same H(D,D).
>
I have one concrete fully operational instance of H/D pairs so
we know that more than zero of them exist.
>
I can adapt this one concrete instance to be the 7 shown below and
we can extrapolate the trend from there:
>
1st element of H/D pairs 1 step of D is simulated by H
2nd element of H/D pairs 2 steps of D are simulated by H
3rd element of H/D pairs 3 steps of D are simulated by H
>
4th element of H/D pairs 4 steps of D are simulated by H
this begins the first recursive simulation at line 01
>
5th element of H/D pairs 5 steps of D are simulated by
next step of the first recursive simulation at line 02
>
6th element of H/D pairs 6 steps of D are simulated by
last step of the first recursive simulation at line 03
>
7th element of H/D pairs 7 steps of D are simulated by H
this begins the second recursive simulation at line 01
>
The one great thing that Mike did was confirm that HH can look
into all of the details of the internal state of its simulated
DD machine and still be a computable function. I suspected
that I might be, yet Mike confirmed that I am correct about this.
>
That does not work in reverse though. A computable function is
is not allowed to look at its caller.
>
 Right, and thus D can change itself to call the H deciding it, and thus needs to be defined to call just one H.
 Also, the question for H isn't the behavior of its caller, but the behavior of the machine described by its input.
 There is nothing in that definition that EXCLUDES that machine calling H (though, due to the structure of Turing Machines, that needs to be another copy of that machine, as the Linz proof does).
 Your problem is you don't seem to understand the basic English words of the problem, maybe because you logic is based on lying and thus needs to avoid being to tied to actual definitions.
*The above is all weasel words that ignore the point*
*The above is all weasel words that ignore the point*
*The above is all weasel words that ignore the point*
Am am only paying attention to your reply to this post @@@
I am not going to sift through all of your weasel words
00 int H(ptr x, ptr x)  // ptr is pointer to int function
01 int D(ptr x)
02 {
03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
04   if (Halt_Status)
05     HERE: goto HERE;
06   return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11   H(D,D);
12 }
Any H/D pair matching the above template where D(D) is simulated
by the same H(D,D) that it calls cannot possibly reach past its own
line 03. Simple software engineering verified fact.
We also must mutually agree that whenever any executed H(D,D)
stops simulating its input that no H ever returns any value to any
simulated D.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 May 24 * Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H409olcott
5 May 24 +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H60Richard Damon
5 May 24 i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
5 May 24 ii`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
5 May 24 i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H39olcott
5 May 24 ii`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H38Richard Damon
5 May 24 ii +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H14olcott
5 May 24 ii i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H13Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H12olcott
6 May 24 ii i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H11Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii i   i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i   i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 ii i   i  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H6olcott
6 May 24 ii i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H5Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii i      `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii i       `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
7 May 24 ii i        `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H23olcott
6 May 24 ii  +- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H --- typo1olcott
6 May 24 ii  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H21Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H10olcott
6 May 24 ii   i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H9Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 ii   i i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H6olcott
6 May 24 ii   i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H5Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii   i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
7 May 24 ii   i      `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H4olcott
6 May 24 ii   i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 ii   i  `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H6olcott
6 May 24 ii    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H5Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---4olcott
6 May 24 ii      `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---3Richard Damon
6 May 24 ii       `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---2olcott
7 May 24 ii        `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ---1Richard Damon
5 May 24 i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H18olcott
5 May 24 i +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H3Richard Damon
5 May 24 i i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H2olcott
6 May 24 i i `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1Richard Damon
7 May 24 i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H14immibis
7 May 24 i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++13olcott
7 May 24 i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++10Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++8olcott
7 May 24 i   ii`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++7Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++6olcott
7 May 24 i   ii  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++5Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   ii   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++4olcott
7 May 24 i   ii    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++3Richard Damon
7 May 24 i   ii     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++2olcott
8 May 24 i   ii      `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++1Richard Damon
9 May 24 i   i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++1immibis
9 May 24 i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H +++2immibis
9 May 24 i    `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1olcott
6 May 24 +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H347olcott
7 May 24 i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H47Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===46olcott
7 May 24 ii `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===45Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===44olcott
7 May 24 ii   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===43Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===42olcott
7 May 24 ii     +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===40Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii     i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===39olcott
7 May 24 ii     i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===38Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii     i  +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===6olcott
8 May 24 ii     i  i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===5Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i  i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===4olcott
8 May 24 ii     i  i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===3Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i  i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===2olcott
8 May 24 ii     i  i    `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===1Richard Damon
7 May 24 ii     i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===31olcott
8 May 24 ii     i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===30Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i    +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===25olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===24Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i    i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===23olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===22Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i    i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@21olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    i    +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@11olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    i    i`* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@10Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i    i    i `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@9olcott
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i  `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@8Richard Damon
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2olcott
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i   i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1Richard Damon
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i   +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2olcott
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i   i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1Richard Damon
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i   `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@3olcott
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2Richard Damon
9 May 24 ii     i    i    i     `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1joes
8 May 24 ii     i    i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@9Richard Damon
8 May 24 ii     i    i     `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@8olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    i      +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@2wij
9 May 24 ii     i    i      i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@1Richard Damon
9 May 24 ii     i    i      `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@5Richard Damon
9 May 24 ii     i    i       `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H @@@4olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    +* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===2olcott
8 May 24 ii     i    `* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===2olcott
9 May 24 ii     `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ===1immibis
7 May 24 i+* Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H298olcott
7 May 24 i`- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1olcott
7 May 24 `- Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H1immibis

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal