Sujet : Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.com (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 08. Jun 2024, 01:21:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v404mk$3b1i8$2@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:35:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/7/2024 5:22 PM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:11:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:
That it is literally impossible to prove that the following is false
conclusively proves that it is true and the proof really need not be
wrapped in any tuxedo.
Why do you care about rebuttals if you don't even consider them possible?
We can get on to other key points only after we have closure on this
{foundation of simulating halt deciders} point.
What do you need closure for? You only want agreement.
I must get closure on each of the four points of my proof so that I know
that my words can possibly be understood. Without this publication is
hopeless.
Publication IS hopeless. As far as your words can be understood, they are
wrong. You could just post all of them.
-- joes
…