Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 2024-06-27 17:18:23 +0000, olcott said:The details of common knowledge of self-evident truth
On 6/27/2024 2:02 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-06-26 12:25:28 +0000, olcott said:>
>>>
I will use your system of reasoning.
The semantics of decimal arithmetic prove that 2 + 3 = 5.
You nave not shown the proof.
That is a stupid thing to say.
No, it is not. Sometimes it is important to say the obvious. Of course,You just did do this:
other things should be said, too, though not necessarily at the same time.
When you try to disagree with arithmetic that provesThat "when" refers to 'never'.
you are a troll that wants to infinitely delay any and
all closure at the possible expense of life on Earth.
We could say that this is true:The same system of reasoning that I use to show howTrue, but your reasoning is not good enough for serious use.
the input to H0(DD) does not halt.
If you don't sufficiently understand the x86 language then*Truth preserving operations applied to expressions of*Yes, as long as you don't provide that you have proven nothing.
*language known to be true*
That human caused climate change is having drastic impactcan stop all dangerous lies that can cause the endNo, they can't. But they can help to figure out whom to trust.
of life on Earth and overturn Democracy with Fascism.
It is the actual foundation of True(L,x) in my redefinitionThe body of formal or natural expressions of languageWhich is not very helpful.
that are {true on the basis of their verbal meaning}
form a semantic tautology of self-evident truth.
Disagreeing with expressions that areIf you disagree that 2 + 3 = 5 then you are an ignoramusThat is a big if. But I know there are people who disagree with
or a liar.
proven truths.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.