Sujet : Re: 197 page execution trace of DDD correctly simulated by HHH
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 28. Jun 2024, 21:28:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5n2sk$3fm1k$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/28/2024 2:18 PM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:53:46 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/28/2024 12:41 PM, joes wrote:
Thanks for leaving the unanswered questions in place, though I’d rather
have you answer them.
I rest my case.
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 12:05:18 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/28/2024 11:26 AM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:25:36 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/28/2024 8:14 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 27 Jun 2024 12:30:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:
To the caller DDD, which then returns to its own caller H0, which
returns „halting” to main… hold on.
Why doesn’t the first recursive H return?
HHH(DDD)
simulates DDD that calls HHH(DDD) that
simulates DDD that calls HHH(DDD) that
proves to the outer directly executed HHH that it must abort and reject.
Alternatively
HHH(DDD)
here:
simulates DDD that calls HHH(DDD) that
goto here: until out-of-memory error.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…