Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 03. Jul 2024, 18:14:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v63tch$28dpi$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/3/2024 11:05 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.jul.2024 om 17:53 schreef olcott:
On 7/3/2024 10:44 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.jul.2024 om 15:22 schreef olcott:
On 7/3/2024 3:33 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 03.jul.2024 om 05:07 schreef olcott:
On 7/2/2024 9:35 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 10:03 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote:
On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>
Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language.
Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser
kernelization process
https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf
>
>
And the x86 language says the same thing,
>
YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give the Diagonalization proof you claimed you had.
>
Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand.
>
You continue to assume that you can simply disagree
with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that
called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ.
I really want to do the best I can to repent.
>
>
But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language.
>
Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it?
>
>
You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is
incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively
proves that it is correct.
>
Nope, and x86n emulation is only fully correct if it continues to the final end.
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
   HERE: goto HERE;
}
>
Why do you say such ridiculously stupid things that you are are false?
>
>
Your Infinite_Loop does not apply. For a two cycle recursive simulation
>
>
This says nothing about two cycles nitwit.
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55               push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec             mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000       push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff       call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404           add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d               pop ebp
[00002183] c3               ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an
emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted.
>
>
>
You told us that HHH aborts its simulation after two cycles.
>
The above HHH refers to every pure function that correctly
emulates one of more steps of DDD.
>
 As long as there are a finite number of steps, there is no infinite recursion. The problem remains that HHH cannot simulate itself correctly.
The job of every halt decider is to predict what
the behavior of its input would be, not to get
stuck in infinite behavior so that it can never
report.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 Jul 24 * Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?70olcott
2 Jul 24 +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?9Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?8olcott
2 Jul 24 i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?7Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?6olcott
2 Jul 24 i   `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?5Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 i    `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?4olcott
2 Jul 24 i     `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?3Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 i      `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?2olcott
3 Jul 24 i       `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?1Richard Damon
2 Jul 24 `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?60Fred. Zwarts
2 Jul 24  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?59olcott
2 Jul 24   `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?58Fred. Zwarts
2 Jul 24    `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?57olcott
2 Jul 24     `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?56Fred. Zwarts
2 Jul 24      `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?55olcott
3 Jul 24       +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?25Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?24olcott
3 Jul 24       i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?23Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?22olcott
3 Jul 24       i   `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?21Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i    `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?20olcott
3 Jul 24       i     `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?19Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i      `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant18olcott
3 Jul 24       i       `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant17Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i        `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant16olcott
3 Jul 24       i         +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant5Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i         i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant4olcott
3 Jul 24       i         i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant3Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i         i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant2olcott
4 Jul 24       i         i   `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant1Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       i         `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant10Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24       i          `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant9olcott
3 Jul 24       i           +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant7Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24       i           i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant6olcott
3 Jul 24       i           i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant5Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24       i           i  +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant2olcott
3 Jul 24       i           i  i`- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant1Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24       i           i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant2olcott
3 Jul 24       i           i   `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jul 24       i           `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Olcott seems to be willfully ignorant1Richard Damon
3 Jul 24       `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?29joes
3 Jul 24        `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?28olcott
3 Jul 24         +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?9Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24         i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?8olcott
3 Jul 24         i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?7Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24         i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?6olcott
3 Jul 24         i   +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?3Fred. Zwarts
3 Jul 24         i   i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?2olcott
3 Jul 24         i   i `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jul 24         i   `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?2joes
4 Jul 24         i    `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?1olcott
3 Jul 24         `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?18joes
3 Jul 24          `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?17olcott
4 Jul 24           +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Yes to both for Peter Olcott14Richard Damon
4 Jul 24           i`* Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe?13olcott
4 Jul 24           i `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Can ADD be this severe?12Richard Damon
4 Jul 24           i  `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar11olcott
4 Jul 24           i   `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar10Richard Damon
4 Jul 24           i    `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ???9olcott
4 Jul 24           i     `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? For Olcott: YES to both.8Richard Damon
4 Jul 24           i      `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...7olcott
4 Jul 24           i       `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...6Richard Damon
4 Jul 24           i        `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...5olcott
4 Jul 24           i         +* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...3Fred. Zwarts
4 Jul 24           i         i`* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...2olcott
4 Jul 24           i         i `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...1Fred. Zwarts
4 Jul 24           i         `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...1Richard Damon
4 Jul 24           `* Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?2joes
4 Jul 24            `- Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal