Sujet : Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as non-halting.
De : F.Zwarts (at) *nospam* HetNet.nl (Fred. Zwarts)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 10. Jul 2024, 19:24:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v6mjlg$20sio$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Op 10.jul.2024 om 20:12 schreef Alan Mackenzie:
[ Followup-To: set ]
In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:
[ .... ]
Proving that the simulation is incorrect. Because a correct simulation
would not abort a halting program halfway its simulation.
Just for clarity, a correct simulation wouldn't abort a non-halting
program either, would it? Or have I misunderstood this correctness?
[ .... ]
A non-halting program cannot be simulated correctly in a finite time. So, it depends whether we can call it a correct simulation, when it does not abort. But, for some meaning of 'correct', indeed, a simulator should not abort a non-halting program either.
…