This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable

On 8/9/2024 10:19 AM, olcott wrote:

On 8/9/2024 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-08 16:01:19 +0000, olcott said:
>

>
It does seem that he is all hung up on not understanding
how the synonymity of bachelor and unmarried works.

>
What in the synonymity, other than the synonymity itself,
would be relevant to Quine's topic?
>

 He mentions it 98 times in his paper
https://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html
I haven't looked at it in years.
 

I don't really give a rat's ass what he said all that matters
to me is that I have defined expressions of language that are
{true on the basis of their meaning expressed in language}
so that I have analytic(Olcott) to make my other points.

>
That does not justify lying.
>

 I never lie. Sometimes I make mistakes.
It looks like you only want to dodge the actual
topic with any distraction that you can find.
 Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
distinction.
 

Expressions of language that are {true on the basis of
their meaning expressed in this same language} defines
analytic(Olcott) that overcomes any objections that
anyone can possibly have about the analytic/synthetic
distinction.
This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable or the
expression is simply untrue because it lacks a truthmaker.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer