Sujet : Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 18. Aug 2024, 13:47:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9sn0p$2c67u$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/18/2024 5:32 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-08-17 14:45:45 +0000, olcott said:
On 8/17/2024 9:40 AM, Richard Damon wrote:>>>
No, you said that "ALL THEY DID" was that, and that is just a LIE.
>
They developed a full formal system.
>
>
They did nothing besides change the definition of
a set and the result of this was a new formal system.
Yes they did. They did show that the new system is similar enough to
the old systems to be called "set theory" and sufficiently useful.
They redefined the notion of a set in set theory and that
by itself got rid of Russell's Paradox. Mostly this disallows
a set to be a member of itself.
I redefine the notion of formal system in math and logic
and this by itself gets rids of undecidability. Mostly this
rejects self-contradictory expressions.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer