Re: A different perspective on undecidability

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: A different perspective on undecidability
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 16. Oct 2024, 18:31:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <veota3$2baph$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/16/2024 11:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-10-16 14:27:09 +0000, olcott said:
 
The whole notion of undecidability is anchored in ignoring the fact that
some expressions of language are simply not truth bearers.
 A formal theory is undecidable if there is no Turing machine that
determines whether a formula of that theory is a theorem of that
theory or not.
When the question: Is finite string X a theory of L?
has no correct answer from YES and NO, then the question
is rejected as not a truth bearer.

Whether an expression is a truth bearer is not
relevant. Either there is a valid proof of that formula or there
is not. No third possibility.
 
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Oct 24 * A different perspective on undecidability70olcott
16 Oct 24 `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability69Mikko
16 Oct 24  +* Re: A different perspective on undecidability5olcott
16 Oct 24  i+* Re: A different perspective on undecidability3olcott
17 Oct 24  ii+- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Richard Damon
21 Oct 24  ii`- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Mikko
21 Oct 24  i`- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Mikko
16 Oct 24  +* Re: A different perspective on undecidability10olcott
17 Oct 24  i+* Re: A different perspective on undecidability8Richard Damon
17 Oct 24  ii+* Re: A different perspective on undecidability2olcott
17 Oct 24  iii`- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Richard Damon
17 Oct 24  ii`* Re: A different perspective on undecidability5olcott
19 Oct 24  ii `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability4Richard Damon
19 Oct 24  ii  `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability3olcott
19 Oct 24  ii   +- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Richard Damon
21 Oct 24  ii   `- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Mikko
21 Oct 24  i`- Re: A different perspective on undecidability1Mikko
22 Oct 24  `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question53olcott
22 Oct 24   +* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question9Richard Damon
22 Oct 24   i`* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question8olcott
22 Oct 24   i `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question7Richard Damon
22 Oct 24   i  `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question6olcott
23 Oct 24   i   `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question5Richard Damon
23 Oct 24   i    `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS4olcott
24 Oct 24   i     `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS3Richard Damon
24 Oct 24   i      `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS2olcott
25 Oct 24   i       `- Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question --- PROGRESS1Richard Damon
22 Oct 24   `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question43Mikko
22 Oct 24    `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question42olcott
24 Oct 24     `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question41Mikko
24 Oct 24      `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question40olcott
25 Oct 24       +- Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question1Richard Damon
25 Oct 24       `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question38Mikko
25 Oct 24        `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question37olcott
25 Oct 24         +- Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question1Richard Damon
26 Oct 24         `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question35Mikko
26 Oct 24          `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question34olcott
26 Oct 24           +* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question29Richard Damon
26 Oct 24           i`* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question28olcott
27 Oct 24           i `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question27Richard Damon
27 Oct 24           i  `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question26olcott
27 Oct 24           i   `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question25Richard Damon
27 Oct 24           i    `* The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---24olcott
27 Oct 24           i     +- Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
6 Nov 24           i     +* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---8olcott
7 Nov 24           i     i+* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---4olcott
8 Nov 24           i     ii`* This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---3olcott
8 Nov 24           i     ii +- Re: This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1wij
8 Nov 24           i     ii `- Re: This philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
7 Nov 24           i     i`* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---3Richard Damon
8 Nov 24           i     i `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---2olcott
8 Nov 24           i     i  `- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---1Richard Damon
10 Nov 24           i     `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct14olcott
10 Nov 24           i      `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct13olcott
10 Nov 24           i       `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct12Richard Damon
10 Nov 24           i        `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct11olcott
10 Nov 24           i         +* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct9joes
10 Nov 24           i         i`* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct8olcott
11 Nov 24           i         i `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct7Richard Damon
13 Nov 24           i         i  `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct6olcott
13 Nov 24           i         i   `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct5Richard Damon
13 Nov 24           i         i    +* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct2olcott
14 Nov 24           i         i    i`- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct1Richard Damon
13 Nov 24           i         i    `* Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct2olcott
14 Nov 24           i         i     `- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct1Richard Damon
10 Nov 24           i         `- Re: The philosophy of logic reformulates existing ideas on a new basis --- infallibly correct1Richard Damon
27 Oct 24           `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question4Mikko
27 Oct 24            `* Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question3olcott
27 Oct 24             +- Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question1Richard Damon
28 Oct 24             `- Re: A different perspective on undecidability --- incorrect question1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal