Waste of EU money / bread and butter of statistics (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Waste of EU money / bread and butter of statistics (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)
De : janburse (at) *nospam* fastmail.fm (Mild Shock)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 06. Nov 2024, 11:18:54
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <vgfc9t$i2kg$2@solani.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
Hi,
Spain is one of the main recipients of EU recovery funds,
with a total of 163 billion euros ($178 billion) earmarked
for the country, approximately half in grants and the rest
in loans. It has already received 37 billion euros.
Madrid and software.imdea.org is no exception. Probably
the same disaster as the Valencia floods. The money
is just siphoned into some crooks pockets. The biggest
crooks are at the moment ALP & friends,
just publishing a series of failure reports. Every
paper just reports some problems, never solutions.
Most recent cringe example:
BoostRLR: The beauty of Prolog for statistical
relational learning
https://www.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/fileadmin/10030600/2024/KI_2004_paper_174.pdf
What the fuck does this mean:
 > In SWI-Prolog, this can rely on an efficient specialised
 > implementation of aggregate_all(count,_,_), while we provide
 > a dedicated low-level XSB implementation in a count module
 > that we include with our program, courtesy of David S.
 > Warren (personal communication).
Why is change_arg/3 not common among Prolog systems.
Why do we deal with aggregates like we are still in
stone age. Aggregates are a well known discipline
of database technology.
Why only aggregate_all/2 and not also a memory savy
solutions of aggregate/3. Aggregates are the bread
and butter of statistics.
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:
Just reading:
 "Deep ecologists reject any mechanical
or computer model of nature, and see
the Earth as a living organism, which
should be treated and understood accordingly"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_ecology#Sources
 Now that we enter the age of AI. What
about an AI Computer model. An AI Earth
Computer model? Any pointers?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jun 24 * Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence13Mild Shock
4 Jun 24 +* Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence3Mild Shock
4 Jun 24 i`* Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence2Mild Shock
4 Jun 24 i `- Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence1Mild Shock
21 Oct 24 +* Happy Birthday 75 Years of Artificial Intelligence2Mild Shock
23 Oct 24 i`- Does ChatGPT know the difference between "k" and "kkkkkkkkkk"?1Mild Shock
23 Oct 24 +- What is it like to be a Bat?1Mild Shock
30 Oct 24 +* Zero Tokens comming out of me (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)2Mild Shock
31 Oct 24 i`- Low-Code Penetration Prediction (Re: Zero Tokens comming out of me)1Mild Shock
6 Nov 24 +* Waste of EU money / bread and butter of statistics (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)2Mild Shock
6 Nov 24 i`- Re: Waste of EU money / bread and butter of statistics (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)1Mild Shock
6 Nov 24 `* FYI: New Journal NAI (Re: Deep Ecology and Artificial Intelligence)2Mild Shock
6 Nov 24  `- The Bee Clock Model (Re: FYI: New Journal NAI)1Mild Shock

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal