Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 16. Nov 2024, 20:54:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhata3$59e5$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 16.11.2024 20:30, Jim Burns wrote:
On 11/15/2024 7:00 AM, WM wrote:
On 15.11.2024 11:43, Mikko wrote:
 
Translated intervals are not
the same as the original ones.
Not only their order
but also their positions can be different
as demonstrated by your example and mine, too.
>
If they do not cover the whole figure
 in their initial order,
then they cannot do so in any other order.
 Sets for which that is true
are finite sets.
Sets for which that is true are sets which obey geometrical rules.
⎝ And our sets do not change.
Therefore the set of intervals cannot grow. The average density is and remains 1/5, i.e., less than 1.
Regards, WM
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
6 Nov 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)214Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24 +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)212WM
6 Nov 24 i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)211Mikko
6 Nov 24 i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)210WM
7 Nov 24 i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)209Mikko
7 Nov 24 i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)207WM
8 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)206Mikko
8 Nov 24 i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)205WM
9 Nov 24 i   i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)204Mikko
9 Nov 24 i   i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)203WM
10 Nov 24 i   i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)202Mikko
10 Nov 24 i   i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)199WM
11 Nov 24 i   i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)198Mikko
11 Nov 24 i   i     i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)196WM
12 Nov 24 i   i     i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)195Mikko
12 Nov 24 i   i     i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)194WM
13 Nov 24 i   i     i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)193Mikko
13 Nov 24 i   i     i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)192WM
14 Nov 24 i   i     i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)191Mikko
14 Nov 24 i   i     i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)190WM
15 Nov 24 i   i     i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)189Mikko
15 Nov 24 i   i     i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)188WM
16 Nov 24 i   i     i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)29Mikko
16 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)28WM
17 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27Mikko
17 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)26WM
17 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25Mikko
17 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)24WM
18 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23Mikko
18 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22WM
19 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)21Mikko
19 Nov 24 i   i     i i        i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20WM
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19Mikko
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11Richard Damon
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Richard Damon
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
14 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
15 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6WM
15 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i     +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
15 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i     i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
15 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i     i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
16 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Mikko
16 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
15 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Mikko
15 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
16 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Mikko
16 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
17 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i               +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Mikko
18 Dec 24 i   i     i i        i               `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
16 Nov 24 i   i     i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)158Jim Burns
16 Nov 24 i   i     i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)157WM
16 Nov 24 i   i     i i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)156Jim Burns
17 Nov 24 i   i     i i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)155WM
18 Nov 24 i   i     i i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)154Jim Burns
19 Nov 24 i   i     i i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)153WM
19 Nov 24 i   i     i i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)152Jim Burns
20 Nov 24 i   i     i i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)151WM
21 Nov 24 i   i     i i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)150Mikko
21 Nov 24 i   i     i i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)149WM
21 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)117Mikko
21 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)116WM
22 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)115Mikko
22 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)114WM
23 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)113Mikko
23 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)112WM
24 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)111Mikko
24 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)110WM
25 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)109Mikko
25 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)108WM
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)107Mikko
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)106WM
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)36Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)35WM
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)34Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)33WM
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)32Richard Damon
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)31WM
26 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)30Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)29WM
27 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)28Richard Damon
27 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27WM
27 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)26Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25WM
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)24Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23WM
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)22Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i              `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)21WM
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i               `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20Richard Damon
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19WM
28 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                 +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16WM
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10WM
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Richard Damon
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8WM
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Richard Damon
8 Dec 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
29 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           i                    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
27 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)69Mikko
21 Nov 24 i   i     i i                  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)31Jim Burns
11 Nov 24 i   i     i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
10 Nov 24 i   i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
7 Nov 24 i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24 `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal