Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 19.11.2024 10:32, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-11-18 14:29:40 +0000, WM said:
 

On 18.11.2024 10:58, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-11-17 12:46:29 +0000, WM said:

>

There are 100 intervals for each natural number.
This can be proven by bijecting J'(100n) and J(n). My intervals are then exhausted, yours are not.

>
Irrelevant.

>
Very relevant.

 It is not relevant if no relevancy is shown.

But if relevancy is only deleted, it can show up again:
Every finite translation of any finite subset of intervals J(n) maintains the relative covering 1/5. If the infinite set has the relative covering 1 (or more), then you claim that the sequence 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, ... has limit 1 (or more).
So you deny analysis or / and geometry.
Regards, WM

 

In mathematics unproven claims do not count.

>
Geometry is only another language of mathematics.

 Therefore unproven claims don't count in geometry.