Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 29.11.2024 21:07, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/29/24 2:28 PM, WM wrote:

Analysis is no a lie.

 Bad Analysis, like what you do is.

The limit of the infinite sequence 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, ... is 1/9. Nothing is clearer than that.

No, I am using a very simple and sound rule. If all hats of finite intervals (0, n] fail to cover more than 1/10, then it is impossible to cover more than 1/10 of the whole set ℕ because beyond all finite intervals and all finite n, there is no supply of black hats.

 So, you admit to MAKING UP your rules based on your own ideas

This chain of arguing is irrefutable by consistent thinking.
Regards, WM