Sujet : Re: Mathematical incompleteness has always been a misconception --- Ultimate Foundation of Truth
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 28. Feb 2025, 05:06:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vprcnm$3gqpb$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/27/25 9:33 AM, olcott wrote:>>
Yes logic is broken when it does not require a truth-maker
for every truth. It is also broken when its idiomatic meaning
of the term "provable" diverges from the meaning of the term
truth-maker. That every truth must have a truth-maker is outside
the scope of what you understand.
But it does, it just you don't seem to understand what a truth makee is?
Where was a statement without a truth-maker used?
Logic remains clueless about the philosophical
notion of truth makers and truth bearers and this is
why logic gets these things incorrectly.
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer