Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 3/22/25 1:36 PM, olcott wrote:When we can express all known truths then we canOn 3/22/2025 11:04 AM, joes wrote:But from them, we can express unknown truths.Am Sat, 22 Mar 2025 10:13:12 -0500 schrieb olcott:>On 3/22/2025 5:11 AM, joes wrote:>Am Fri, 21 Mar 2025 22:03:39 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 3/21/2025 9:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/21/25 9:24 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/21/2025 7:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/21/25 8:40 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/21/2025 6:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/21/25 8:43 AM, olcott wrote:On 3/21/2025 3:41 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2025-03-20 14:57:16 +0000, olcott said:On 3/20/2025 6:00 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/19/25 10:42 PM, olcott wrote:>Because my system begins with basic facts and actual facts can't
contradict each other and no contradiction can be formed by
applying only truth preserving operations to these basic facts
there are no contradictions in the system.^The liar sentence is contradictory.
>>It is self evidence that for every element of the set of human
knowledge that can be expressed using language that undecidability
cannot possibly exist.^Not self-evident was Gödel's disproof of that.
>You must pay complete attention to ALL of my words or you get theNot if X is unknown (but still true).True(X) ONLY validates that X is true and does nothing else.When the body of human general knowledge has all of its semanticsYes, proof is a validatation of truth, but truth does not need to be
encoded syntactically AKA Montague Grammar of Semantics then a proof
means validation of truth.
able to be validated.
meaning that I specify incorrectly.Try explaining differently, then. What does your supposed truth predicate>
say about unknown truths?
>
The body of human general knowledge that can be expressed
using language contains zero unknown truths.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.