Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 10. Mar 2024, 15:55:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <uske41$307ls$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-03-10 11:16:28 +0000, WM said:

On 09.03.2024 18:30, Mike Terry wrote:
 
 I agree that the chosen wording above is likely to confuse particulaly non-mathematicians.  That's why when mathematicians talk about infinite sets, they are careful to /define/ the phrases they use to describe them.
 And they will not accept that their definition is misleading.
In mathematics that is not relevant.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Mar 24 * A paradox about Cantor's set theory9wij
10 Mar 24 +* Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory6wij
10 Mar 24 i`* Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory5Mike Terry
11 Mar 24 i +* Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory3wij
11 Mar 24 i i`* Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory2wij
11 Mar 24 i i `- Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory1wij
12 Mar 24 i `- Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory1WM
10 Mar 24 `* Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory2WM
10 Mar 24  `- Re: A paradox about Cantor's set theory1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal