Re: ZFC solution to incorrect questions: reject them --undecidability decider--

On 13/03/24 23:36, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2024 5:35 PM, immibis wrote:

On 13/03/24 23:29, olcott wrote:

There is a mapping from H(D,D) to 0 and a mapping from H1(D,D) to 1
that is fully explained by the ability of C functions to know their
own address. This the implicit (not hidden) extra parameter is an
element of the input of this mapping.

>
H just knows the number 0x00001422 and H1 knows 0x00001522 which, by complete coincidence, are their own addresses.

 I warned you about Trollish replies
You know it is no coincidence.
 

 If we copy H to address 0x00001622 it will still only know the number 0x00001422 and not the number 0x00001622.
>

You refuse to address the actual point: If we copy H to address 0x00001622 it will still only know the number 0x00001422 and not the number 0x00001622.