Sujet : Re: Proving my 2004 claim that some decider/input pairs are incorrect questions
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 17. Mar 2024, 17:12:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <ut7182$3j575$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-03-15 14:46:09 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/15/2024 5:34 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-13 14:19:22 +0000, olcott said:
On 3/13/2024 4:10 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-03-12 14:45:51 +0000, olcott said:
This is my 2004 work that proposes that the halting problem has
an unsatisfiable specification thus asks an ill-formed question.
The question "Is the specification of halt decider satisfiable?"
is not ill-formed.
Whenever undecidability is anchored epistemological antinomy
that means that the decider is trying to determine whether
a self-contradictory expression is true or false. All of these
cases are ill-formed.
The self-contradictory nature of the halting problem counter-example
input makes this input ill-formed.
...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar undecidability proof...
...We are therefore confronted with a proposition which asserts its own unprovability. 15 ...
(Gödel 1931:43-44)
Nice to see that you don't disagree.
I just showed how and why Gödel' comments are incorrect.
No, you didn't. You just quoted some but said nothing obout them.
-- Mikko
Proving my 2004 claim that some decider/input pairs are incorrect questions
Re: Proving my 2004 claim that some decider/input pairs are incorrect questions