Sujet : Re: Can any pathological input thwart a simulating abort decider?
De : polcott2 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 29. Mar 2024, 03:45:15
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uu56fb$3tt5t$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/28/2024 7:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/28/24 11:24 AM, olcott wrote:
On 3/28/2024 6:42 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/27/24 11:39 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/27/2024 10:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/27/24 11:26 PM, olcott wrote:
On 3/27/2024 10:09 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/27/24 10:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>
Note, that Levitical ordinance, does NOT carry into the new coventent, so Paul isn't refering to it.
>
>
The "Sideburns" tend to refer to a somewhat lower place on the side of the face.
>
So, you are MISTRANSLATING the word.
>
Also, that was part of the CEREMONIAL Law, a distinctive like circumcision that was done away with.
>
Yes you are good on this.
>
I diligently make sure to totally ignore every law of God that
does not directly or indirectly pertain to loving others as myself.
>
And thus condemn yourself to the lake of FIRE.
>
>
*Not if Galatians 5:14 is literally true*
*Not if Galatians 5:14 is literally true*
*Not if Galatians 5:14 is literally true*
>
Which isn't the way the words were meant.
>
That is DEVIL WORSHIP talking
>
>
What exactly makes you the judge of this?
>
I do my best based on what I know, and issue the warning based on it,
>
God will make the final decision.
>
>
>
Galatians 5:14 NRSV
For the whole law is summed up in a single commandment,
“You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
>
Which is probably for the better, as you would find Heaven unbearable with having to willingly follow ALL of Gods Law would be intolerable.
>
>
Love one another with as much empathy as possible is the only
law of God that I strive to obey. Focusing on anything else
is a dangerous distraction away from righteousness.
>
>
And thus not actually loving your neighor the way you need to.
>
>
How would you know?
What is your criterion measure?
>
Loving as God would love. Which means you need to understand ALL of God first, not just the one aspect that you are willing to look at.
>
>
Sure simply totally 100% become Christ and then simply love others.
Love others as I have loved you...
>
You think you CAN become "Christ"?
>
Do you understand what that claim entails?
>
Do you understand what falsely making that claim means?
>
Every Christian is required to become as Christ like as they possibly can. Love them as I have loved you.
No, as if that was true, we should all try to be scourged and crucified, and some how find the power to cast out demons and heal the sick.
Every Christian is called to try to live the life that Jesus described for his Disciples.
You are just showing you don't understand the Bible.
>
>
>
Every denomination believes that they are the one that is
correct and this cannot possibly be true for every denomination.
This proves that art least most of them are wrong.
>
It makes loving others with empathy superior guidance because this
screens out self-righteous judgmentalism.
>
But make it so you don't actually need to love them the way you are told to.
>
>
What exactly make *you* the judge of this?
>
>
You wouldn't understand. I am not the actual Judge, but can see how the Judge is likely going to look at things.
>
Ah so you are guessing or estimating.
>
No, it isn't a "guess", as the criteria is clearly laid out to those who are willing to make the effort to understand.
>
>
If that was true then there would not be differing denominations
of Christ.
There shouldn't be, but because people are flawed and divide over things that they shouldn't, we end up with this.
Also, as you pointed out, many people claiming to be "Christians" aren't acting like them, and thus it seems reasonable that some of these would form "Churches" that look something like Christ's Church, but aren't.
>
God WILL judge those that oppose his authority, like you are doing.
>
I don't oppose God's authority. I vehemently oppose the authority of fallible humans
Then why do you "pick and choose" which commands of God you will follow?
Which laws do you think are still in effect?
>
Isaiah 64:6 (KJV)
...and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags;
Yep, if we try to do it "our way", we are just "filthy rags".
We need to let God take over so he can change us, not try to define how God is to work.
>
>
I see much in what you do that makes it clear that God is not guiding your life, and thus you do not understand.
>
>
>
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Can any pathological input thwart a simulating abort decider?
Re: Can any pathological input thwart a simulating abort decider?