Sujet : Re: Can there be a truth without a truthmaker?
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 04. Apr 2024, 08:16:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uulgkf$ftqj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/4/2024 12:54 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:50:14 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 4/4/2024 12:18 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:50:50 -0500, olcott wrote:
>
A truth without a truthmaker is like a cake without a baker,
non-existent.
>
Where does the truthmaker come from?
>
An analytic truthmaker is any expression of language derived from
expressions that are stipulated to be true. These are usually the
definitions providing the semantic meanings of terms.
So “truthmaker” is a matter of definition? A set of “axioms of truth”, if
you like?
Only for analytic truth-makers.
Axioms of truth and what is semantically deduced from them.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Can there be a truth without a truthmaker?
Re: Can there be a truth without a truthmaker?
