Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2

On 4/19/24 3:48 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-04-18 22:33:03 +0000, Richard Damon said:
 

On 4/18/24 10:53 AM, olcott wrote:

On 4/17/2024 9:34 PM, olcott wrote:

...14 Every epistemological antinomy can likewise be used for a similar
undecidability proof...(Gödel 1931:43-44)
>
*Parphrased as*
Every expression X that cannot possibly be true or false proves that the
formal system F cannot correctly determine whether X is true or false.
Which shows that X is undecidable in F.
>
Which shows that F is incomplete, even though X cannot possibly be a
proposition in F because propositions must be true or false.
>
A proposition is a central concept in the philosophy of language,
semantics, logic, and related fields, often characterized as the primary
bearer of truth or falsity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition
>

>
I posted this here to establish priority date. I already have
another person on a different forum that fully understands what
I am saying and are publishing my ideas as their own.
>

>
Why do you need "priority" to a LIE?

 To produce a lie requires a creative action that is not needed to
produce a truth, which may have be significant for copyright.
 

True, but he has made that same incorrect statement many times in the past, so reposting doesn't add to his "priority".