Re: Undecidability based on epistemological antinomies V2 --correct reasoning--

On 4/21/24 8:22 PM, olcott wrote:

On 4/21/2024 6:52 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

It seems, your problem is that you just don't understand the nuances of the papers, and in your stupidity assume this means the other people are just wrong, when the error is on YOUR part.
>

 The bottom line of all of this (even if my summation is not
precisely accurate) is the Quine convinced most people that
{true on the basis of meaning} is not a viable notion.

Or, to paraphrase you, you think everyone else is as stupid as you.
Fortunately, that isn't true.

 It has never been the case that the precise nuances of detail
have ever mattered at all. It has always been the case that
the gist of the matter is crucial.

And you think it isn't important to be totally correct.

 {True on the basis of meaning} is the actual ultimate foundation
of correct reasoning.

Which means, as has been pointed out, your idea of "Correct Reasoning" is insufficient for most actual logic problems, as it can only handle the very simple cases.