Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 4/28/24 9:52 AM, olcott wrote:The only way to get people to understand that I am correctOn 4/28/2024 8:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:You admit that people see that as being a claim about the Halting Problem, and thus the implied definitons of the terms apply.On 4/28/24 8:56 AM, olcott wrote:>On 4/28/2024 3:23 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2024-04-28 00:17:48 +0000, olcott said:>
>Can D simulated by H terminate normally?>
One should not that "D simulated by H" is not the same as
"simulation of D by H". The message below seems to be more
about the latter than the former. In any case, it is more
about the properties of H than about the properties of D.
>
D specifies what is essentially infinite recursion to H.
Several people agreed that D simulated by H cannot possibly
reach past its own line 03 no matter what H does.
Nope, it is only that if H fails to be a decider.
>
*We don't make this leap of logic. I never used the term decider*
*We don't make this leap of logic. I never used the term decider*
*We don't make this leap of logic. I never used the term decider*
*We don't make this leap of logic. I never used the term decider*
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.