Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 5/10/2024 10:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:In and about formal logic there is no valid deep understanding. OnlyOn 5/10/24 11:35 PM, olcott wrote:I don't need to know anything about what he was talking aboutOn 5/10/2024 10:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:You don't understand what Quite was talking about,On 5/10/24 10:36 PM, olcott wrote:YES and there are axioms that comprise the verbal model of theThe entire body of expressions that are {true on the basis of theirYou do know that what you are describing when applied to Formal Systems are the axioms of the system and the most primitively provable theorems.
meaning} involves nothing more or less than stipulated relations between
finite strings.
actual world, thus Quine was wrong.
except that he disagreed with {true on the basis or meaning}.
I don't care or need to know how he got to an incorrect answer.
I understand this much more deeply than you do.Which you don't seem to understand what that means.You don't seem to understand what "Formal Logic" actually means.Ultimately it is anchored in stipulated relations between finite
strings (AKA axioms) and expressions derived from applying truth
preserving operations to these axioms.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.