Re: Nature of undecidable halting ---Handling undecidable inputs

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Nature of undecidable halting ---Handling undecidable inputs
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 17. May 2024, 17:49:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v281r5$29h8q$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/17/2024 5:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-05-16 13:20:48 +0000, joes said:
 
Am Thu, 16 May 2024 13:42:41 +0300 schrieb Mikko:
On 2024-05-15 15:06:26 +0000, olcott said:
I refer to transitioning through a specific state to indicate a
specific halt status value, for Turing Machines.
>
That does not satisfy the usual definition of "halt decider". However,
we could accept that as a solution to the halting problem if one could
prove that there is a Turing machine that can indicate halting or
non-halting that way for all computations.
>
However, it is possible to prove that every Turing machine that
indicates halting that way fails to indicate correctly at least some
computations.
>
Are these all of the liar paradox kind, such that one could easily
exclude them? Or do they form a more interesting class?
 The discussions hera are mainly about the liar paradox or Quine paradox
kind. They ara not always easy to exclude, and one can always modify the
code so that exclusion becomes harder but behaviour remanis the same.
 
Expressions that are {true on the basis of meaning} are ONLY
(a) A set of finite string semantic meanings that form an accurate model
     of the general knowledge of the actual world.
(b) Expressions derived by applying truth preserving operations to (a).
The above algorithm specifies True(L,x) and False(L,x) defined
as True(L, ~x).
The above expressions include all of expressions of math, logic and
computations specified as finite strings. The above True(L,x) combined
with False(L,x) seems to screen out any any all undecidable inputs.
Truthbearer(L,x) ≡ (True(L,x) ∨ False(L,x)) else type mismatch error.

There are also very different problems that are known to be uncomputable,
e.g., the problem whether a sentence in the language of the first order
goup theory is a theorem of that theory -- nothing like the liars paradox
is possible in that language.
 
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 May 24 * Re: Is Richard a Liar?143olcott
14 May 24 +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?127Alan Mackenzie
14 May 24 i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?126olcott
14 May 24 i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?125Fred. Zwarts
14 May 24 i  `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?124olcott
14 May 24 i   +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?122Fred. Zwarts
14 May 24 i   i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?121olcott
14 May 24 i   i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?119Fred. Zwarts
14 May 24 i   i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?118olcott
14 May 24 i   i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?19joes
14 May 24 i   i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?18olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?16olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i  +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3joes
15 May 24 i   i i i  i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i  i `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i  +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i  `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?11Mikko
16 May 24 i   i i i   `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?10olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i    +- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Fred. Zwarts
17 May 24 i   i i i    +- Re: Olcott is a patholgociat liar!1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i i i    +* Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts V23olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i    i+- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts V21Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i    i`- Re: Every D correctly simulated by H never reaches its final state and halts V21Mikko
17 May 24 i   i i i    `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?4Mikko
17 May 24 i   i i i     `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i      +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i      `- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Mikko
14 May 24 i   i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?79Fred. Zwarts
14 May 24 i   i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?78olcott
14 May 24 i   i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?68Fred. Zwarts
14 May 24 i   i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?67olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?60Fred. Zwarts
15 May 24 i   i i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?59olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?57Fred. Zwarts
15 May 24 i   i i i i i i+* Re: Is Richard a Liar?53olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i i i ii+* Re: Is Richard a Liar?51Fred. Zwarts
15 May 24 i   i i i i i iii`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?50olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i i i iii +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?48Fred. Zwarts
15 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?47olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i +- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Fred. Zwarts
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?11Mikko
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?10olcott
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i +- Re: Olcott is a patholgociat liar!1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?5Mikko
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?4olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i i +- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Mikko
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i i `- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1joes
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3immibis
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i  `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i i   `- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?33Fred. Zwarts
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i  `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?32olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?30Fred. Zwarts
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?29olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?25Fred. Zwarts
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?24olcott
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i +- Re: Olcott is a patholgociat liar!1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?19Fred. Zwarts
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?18olcott
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?12Fred. Zwarts
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?11olcott
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?9Fred. Zwarts
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?8olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i +- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Mikko
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i +- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Fred. Zwarts
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3joes
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i i `- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i i `- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Fred. Zwarts
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i i `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i `* Re: Olcott is a Liar?5Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i  `* No Message-ID therefore construed as Liar4olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i   `* Re: No Message-ID therefore construed as Liar3Richard Damon
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i    `* Re: No Message-ID therefore construed as Liar2olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i i     `- Re: No Message-ID therefore construed as Liar. Message ID Provided, so OLCOTT is the LIAR.1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3Fred. Zwarts
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i  `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i i   `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i +- Re: Olcott is a patholgociat liar!1Richard Damon
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
18 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   i  `- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Mikko
17 May 24 i   i i i i i iii i   `- Re: Olcott is a patholgociat liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i i i iii `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i i i ii`- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i i i i +- Re: Is Richard a Liar?1Fred. Zwarts
16 May 24 i   i i i i i i `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i i i `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i i +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3joes
15 May 24 i   i i i i i`* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i i i `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?2olcott
16 May 24 i   i i i i  `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?8olcott
15 May 24 i   i i i  +* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3joes
16 May 24 i   i i i  +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 i   i i i  `* Re: Is Richard a Liar?3Mikko
15 May 24 i   i i +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   i i `* Re: Is Richard a Liar? No!18Alan Mackenzie
15 May 24 i   i `- Re: Olcott is a Pathological Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 i   `- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
15 May 24 +- Re: Olcott is a Liar!1Richard Damon
16 May 24 +* Unconventional partial halt decider and grounding to a truthmaker10olcott
16 May 24 +* Re: Nature of undecidable halting --- Connecting truth-bearers to their truthmaker2olcott
17 May 24 `* Re: Nature of undecidable halting ---Handling undecidable inputs2olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal