Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 26. May 2024, 01:14:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v2trch$23vgp$1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/25/24 7:11 PM, olcott wrote:
On 5/25/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 5/25/24 6:53 PM, olcott wrote:
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
*We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
>
No we need to handle them to know what you have defined.
>
After all, if we don't agree on the inmplications, we don't have agreement on what is being stipuated as the defintions.
>
>
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
*Thus trolling me is made impotent*
>
>
They are not "Baseless" but based on the actual definitions of the terms that you are changing.
>
 *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
*In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
Didn't say that, which shows you to be a liar, or at least being deceptive, which is why we need to handle the implications first
(Note, you are just proving that you don't understand how logic works)
The implications of your specifications are:
1) That your H is NOT a computation equivalent for a Turing machine.
2) That you simulations do NOT say anything about the actual behavior of the machine given on the input, especially about its halting status.
3) That you "infinite set of H/D pairs" does NOT correspond to the concept of the behavior of a machine, and
4) That you D and H are NOT eqivalents of the corresponding things in the Linz or Sipser proofs.
5) You are not interested in Honest Dialog, but are hoping someone will agree to baddly defined terms so you can claim support for your lies.

 typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int D(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         H(D,D);
12         return 0;
13       }
 The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is correctly simulated by pure function H. This was done because many reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly switch which H/D pair was being referred to.
 *Correct Simulation Defined*
    A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates 1 to N of the
    x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86 instructions
    of D. This may include M recursive emulations of H emulating itself
    emulating D.
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 24 * Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?146olcott
24 May 24 +* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?23Richard Damon
24 May 24 i+* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?10olcott
24 May 24 ii`* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?9Richard Damon
24 May 24 ii `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?8olcott
24 May 24 ii  `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?7Richard Damon
24 May 24 ii   `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?6olcott
24 May 24 ii    `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?5Richard Damon
24 May 24 ii     `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?4olcott
24 May 24 ii      `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?3Richard Damon
24 May 24 ii       `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?2olcott
25 May 24 ii        `- Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?1Richard Damon
24 May 24 i`* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?12Fred. Zwarts
24 May 24 i +* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?5Richard Damon
24 May 24 i i`* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?4olcott
24 May 24 i i `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?3Richard Damon
24 May 24 i i  `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?2olcott
25 May 24 i i   `- Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?1Richard Damon
24 May 24 i `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?6olcott
24 May 24 i  `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?5Richard Damon
24 May 24 i   `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?4olcott
24 May 24 i    `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?3Richard Damon
24 May 24 i     `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?2olcott
25 May 24 i      `- Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?1Richard Damon
24 May 24 `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?122Fred. Zwarts
24 May 24  `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?121olcott
24 May 24   `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?120Richard Damon
24 May 24    `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?119olcott
24 May 24     `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?118Richard Damon
24 May 24      `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?117olcott
25 May 24       +- Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?1Richard Damon
25 May 24       `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?115olcott
25 May 24        `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?114Richard Damon
25 May 24         `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?113olcott
25 May 24          `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?112Richard Damon
25 May 24           `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?111olcott
25 May 24            +* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?108Richard Damon
25 May 24            i`* D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06107olcott
25 May 24            i `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06106Richard Damon
25 May 24            i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06105olcott
25 May 24            i   +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06103Richard Damon
25 May 24            i   i`* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06102olcott
25 May 24            i   i `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06101Richard Damon
25 May 24            i   i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06100olcott
25 May 24            i   i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0699Richard Damon
25 May 24            i   i    `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0698olcott
25 May 24            i   i     `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0697Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i      +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 066olcott
26 May 24            i   i      i`* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 065Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i      i `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 064olcott
26 May 24            i   i      i  `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 063Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i      i   `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 062olcott
26 May 24            i   i      i    `- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 061Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i      `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0690olcott
26 May 24            i   i       `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0689Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i        `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0688olcott
26 May 24            i   i         `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0687Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i          `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0686olcott
26 May 24            i   i           `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0685Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i            `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0684olcott
26 May 24            i   i             `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0683Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i              `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0682olcott
26 May 24            i   i               `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0681Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 062olcott
26 May 24            i   i                i`- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 061Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0678olcott
26 May 24            i   i                 `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 0677Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                  +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 066olcott
26 May 24            i   i                  i`* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 065Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                  i +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 062olcott
26 May 24            i   i                  i i`- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 061Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                  i `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 062olcott
26 May 24            i   i                  i  `- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 061Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                  `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest?70olcott
26 May 24            i   i                   `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest?69Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                    `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest?68olcott
26 May 24            i   i                     `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest?67Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                      `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest?66olcott
26 May 24            i   i                       `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest?65Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                        `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 ---64olcott
26 May 24            i   i                         `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 ---63Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                          `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 ---62olcott
26 May 24            i   i                           `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 ---61Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                            +* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof4olcott
26 May 24            i   i                            i`* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof3Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                            i `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof2olcott
26 May 24            i   i                            i  `- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof1Richard Damon
26 May 24            i   i                            `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz56olcott
26 May 24            i   i                             `* Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz55Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                              `* A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩54olcott
27 May 24            i   i                               `* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩53Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                                `* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩52olcott
27 May 24            i   i                                 `* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩51Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                                  +* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩4olcott
27 May 24            i   i                                  i`* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩3Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                                  i `* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩2olcott
27 May 24            i   i                                  i  `- Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩1Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                                  `* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩46olcott
27 May 24            i   i                                   +* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩3Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                                   i`* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩2olcott
27 May 24            i   i                                   i `- Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩1Richard Damon
27 May 24            i   i                                   `* Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩42olcott
25 May 24            i   `- Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 061Alan Mackenzie
26 May 24            `* Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?2Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal