Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 26. May 2024, 10:47:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <v2usv6$3bglv$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2024-05-25 15:27:22 +0000, olcott said:

x ∉ True if and only if p
where the symbol 'p' represents the whole sentence x
https://liarparadox.org/Tarski_275_276.pdf
 First we convert the clumsy indirect approximation of
self-reference by getting rid of the extraneous x we
also swap the LHS with the RHS.
p if and only if p ∉ True
Note that this transformation is not proven to be truth preserving.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
25 May 24 * Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox12olcott
25 May 24 +* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox9Richard Damon
25 May 24 i`* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox8olcott
25 May 24 i `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox7Richard Damon
25 May 24 i  `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox6olcott
25 May 24 i   `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox5Richard Damon
25 May 24 i    `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox4olcott
25 May 24 i     `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox3Richard Damon
25 May 24 i      `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox2olcott
25 May 24 i       `- Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox1Richard Damon
26 May 24 `* Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox2Mikko
26 May 24  `- Re: Tarski Undefinability and the correctly formalized Liar Paradox1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal