Sujet : Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 27. May 2024, 03:06:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v30pr8$3r67p$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
Ĥ copies its own Turing machine description: ⟨Ĥ⟩
then invokes embedded_H that simulates ⟨Ĥ⟩ with ⟨Ĥ⟩ as input.
It is an easily verified fact that ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ correctly simulated by
embedded_H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final state of
⟨Ĥ.qn⟩ in any finite sequence of steps such as Googolplex ^ Googolplex
number of steps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoogolplexUNLESS YOU CAN PROVE THAT A UTM CANNOT POSSIBLY BE ADAPTED TO COUNT
THE NUMBER OF STEPS AND THEN STOP I AM CORRECT AND YOU ARE DISHONEST
*Your dishonest dodge strawman deception is not me lying*
*Your dishonest dodge strawman deception is not me lying*
*Your dishonest dodge strawman deception is not me lying*
UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE THAT A UTM CANNOT POSSIBLY BE ADAPTED TO COUNT
THE NUMBER OF STEPS AND THEN STOP I AM CORRECT AND YOU ARE DISHONEST
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
23 May 24 | Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 146 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |  Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 23 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |   Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 10 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 9 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |     Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 8 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 7 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |       Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 6 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 5 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |         Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 4 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 3 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |           Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 2 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |            Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |   Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 12 | | Fred. Zwarts |
24 May 24 |    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 5 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |     Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 4 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 3 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |       Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 2 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 6 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |     Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 5 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 4 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |       Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 3 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 2 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |         Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |  Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 122 | | Fred. Zwarts |
24 May 24 |   Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 121 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |    Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 120 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |     Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 119 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |      Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 118 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |       Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 117 | | olcott |
24 May 24 |        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 1 | | Richard Damon |
24 May 24 |        Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 115 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |         Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 114 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |          Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 113 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |           Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 112 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |            Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 111 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |             Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 108 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |              D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 107 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |               Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 106 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 105 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                 Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 103 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                  Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 102 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                   Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 101 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                    Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 100 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                     Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 99 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                      Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 98 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                       Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 97 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                        Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 6 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                         Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 5 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                          Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 4 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                           Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 3 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                            Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 2 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                             Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 1 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                        Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 90 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                         Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 89 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                          Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 88 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                           Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 87 | | Richard Damon |
25 May 24 |                            Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 86 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                             Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 85 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                              Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 84 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                               Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 83 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 82 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                 Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 81 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                  Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 2 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                   Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 1 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                  Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 78 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                   Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 77 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                    Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 6 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                     Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 5 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                      Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 2 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                       Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 1 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                      Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 2 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                       Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 1 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                    Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest? | 70 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                     Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest? | 69 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                      Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest? | 68 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                       Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest? | 67 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                        Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest? | 66 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                         Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Dishonest? | 65 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                          Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- | 64 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                           Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- | 63 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                            Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- | 62 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                             Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- | 61 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                              Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof | 4 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                               Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof | 3 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                                Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof | 2 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                                 Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz proof | 1 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                              Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz | 56 | | olcott |
26 May 24 |                                               Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 --- Linz | 55 | | Richard Damon |
26 May 24 |                                                A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 54 | | olcott |
27 May 24 |                                                 Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 53 | | Richard Damon |
27 May 24 |                                                  Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 52 | | olcott |
27 May 24 |                                                   Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 51 | | Richard Damon |
27 May 24 |                                                    Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 4 | | olcott |
27 May 24 |                                                     Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 3 | | Richard Damon |
27 May 24 |                                                      Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 2 | | olcott |
27 May 24 |                                                       Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 1 | | Richard Damon |
27 May 24 |                                                    Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 46 | | olcott |
27 May 24 |                                                     Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 3 | | Richard Damon |
27 May 24 |                                                      Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 2 | | olcott |
27 May 24 |                                                       Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 1 | | Richard Damon |
27 May 24 |                                                     Re: A simulating halt decider applied to the The Peter Linz Turing Machine description ⟨Ĥ⟩ | 42 | | olcott |
25 May 24 |                 Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 | 1 | | Alan Mackenzie |
26 May 24 |             Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? | 2 | | Fred. Zwarts |