Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact

On 6/4/2024 8:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/4/24 5:53 PM, olcott wrote:

https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf
>
At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact that the above
link conclusively proves that DD <is> correctly simulated by HH.
>
It has been just like I smash a Boston cream pie in their face and they
persistently deny that there ever was any pie as this pie drips from
their face.
>
>

 The problem iks you use the WRONG DEFINITION of "Simulated Correctly" to allow the simulation to say anything about the behavior of the machine being simulated.
 

*I conclusively proved otherwise in the above link*

You have been told this repeatedly, so your refusal to listen just proves that you are an ignorant pathological liar that reckless disregards the truth and beleives his own lies.

If you have reasoning to prove otherwise provide it otherwise
everyone will know that you have no basis for any rebuttal.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer