Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 06. Jun 2024, 13:11:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <v3s5gt$36git$3@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/6/24 1:57 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 11:06 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/6/24 12:04 AM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a partial simulation of a machine indicates what it will do after the simulation stopped, and that the simulation of a DIFFERENT machine tells you of the behavior of a different machine then simulated.
>
*I will dumb it down for you some more*
Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
>
>
I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad question.
>
>
THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
THAT I AM INCORRECT
>
Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just don't care about that worthless claim. Only when you cross the line from talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH saw, to the OBJECTIVE behavior of the machine the input represents to a Halt Decider, will you get me caring, and slapping you down hard with a factual rebuttal.
>
>
*I will dumb it down for you some more*
Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
>
But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort to confirm that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a damn because it is MEANINGLESS.
>
>
THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
THAT I AM INCORRECT
>
But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>
>
THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
THAT I AM INCORRECT
>
But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>
>
THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
THAT I AM INCORRECT
>
But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>
>
THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
THAT I AM INCORRECT
>
But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>
 *THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF MY WHOLE PROOF*
THUS THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT UNTIL
YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT
But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
Since partial simulations, or simulation of a different input, don't prove non-halting behavior of this input, it just doesn't matter.
So, I guess we are stuck until you just die of your cancer.
I am going to take your just repeating of what I have said is worthless as an admission that you can't think of any way to show that it actually means something, your admission that this is just the strawman that you "proof" has been based on for years, that doesn't actually prove what you claim.

 *I will dumb it down for you some more*
Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
And I will dumb it down for you.
I DON'T CARE BECAUSE YOUR CLAIM MEANS NOTHING IMPORTANT.

 _DD()
[00001db2] 55 push ebp
[00001db3] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00001db5] 51 push ecx
[00001db6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00001db9] 50 push eax ; push DD
[00001dba] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001dbd] 51 push ecx ; push DD
[00001dbe] e8bff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH
 *Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention*
*He is not a liar*
 *This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH*
https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf
 

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jun 24 * At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact100olcott
5 Jun 24 +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact95Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact94olcott
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact93Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact92olcott
5 Jun 24 i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact91Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact90olcott
5 Jun 24 i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact85Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact84olcott
5 Jun 24 i     i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
5 Jun 24 i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact82Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact81olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact79Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact78olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact76Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact75olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact74Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact73olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact72Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact71olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact70Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact69olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact68Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact67olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact66Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact65olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact64Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact57olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i+- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1wij
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact55Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact54olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact53Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard52olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard44Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard43olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard42Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard17olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i+* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard13Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard12olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard11Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard10olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii   +* Re: Last communication with Richard2Rich Yard Daemon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii   i`- Re: Last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii      +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii      i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Fred. Zwarts
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i  `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard24olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard21Alan Mackenzie
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard20olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1wij
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard15Alan Mackenzie
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)14olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure12olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure11Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure10olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure9Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure8olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure7Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure6olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure5Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure4olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i            `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i      `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact6olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i             `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact5Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i              +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i              i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i              `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i               `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
6 Jun 24 i     i   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
6 Jun 24 i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact4ornott
6 Jun 24 i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3olcott
6 Jun 24 i       +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1prescott
7 Jun 24 i       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
5 Jun 24 `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
5 Jun 24   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal