Sujet : Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact
De : news2 (at) *nospam* immibis.com (prescott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 06. Jun 2024, 19:03:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3stl0$1infb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/06/24 18:56, olcott wrote:
On 6/6/2024 11:48 AM, ornott wrote:
On 5/06/24 04:55, olcott wrote:
The machine description of DD specifies that it does not halt to
simulating halt decider HH and you already know that you cannot
possibly prove otherwise.
>
The machine description of DD specifies (to everyone) that it halts if HH(DD,DD) returns 0.
>
From: ornott <news2@immibis.com>
established Liar.
You are unable to refute this established fact:
> On 5/06/24 04:19, olcott wrote:
>> It is fully operational C code it can run out of stack space
>> even if you give it googolplex of terabytes.
>
> Sounds like it's infinite recursion. Infinite recursion doesn't halt. > Deciders always halt, so a program that's infinitely recursive isn't a > decider.
because it is true.