Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic
Date : 08. Jun 2024, 01:31:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4058v$2965i$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/7/2024 6:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/7/24 6:24 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 3:56 PM, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:31:10 -0500 schrieb olcott:
On 6/7/2024 1:57 PM, wij wrote:
On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 13:41 -0500, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 1:24 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/7/24 2:02 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/7/2024 12:50 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Anyone claiming that HH should report on the behavior of the
directly executed DD(DD) is requiring a violation of the above
definition of correct simulation.
>
And thus you admit that HH is not a Halt Decider,
>
The Halting Problem asks for a program H (precisely a TM) that:
IF H(D,D)==1, THEN D(D) will return.
ELSE If H(D,D)==0, THEN D(D) will never return.
ELSE HP is undecidable
>
When we can show that even in the halting problem HH is only required to
report on the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH these dishonest
people merely use that as another deflection point for their dishonesty.
The way around this that just worked is to stay diligently focused one
one single point until the dishonest people finally admit that they have
simply ignored all the proofs for three solid years.
 >
"only" It must report on the behaviour of DD, which must be the same when
simulated. It can't simulate something different and say "look! My result
simulating this is right, because it is my result!".
>
>
The most persistent false assumption that cannot possibly
be corrected without expertise in the x86 programming language.
Some people here have that.
 You seem confused.
  I haven't seen ANYONE complain about any x86 instruciton actually simulated.
 The complaints have always been about those NOT simulated by your system, like the CALL H instruction.
 
It estimates the the full trace is 230 pages it is actually 246 pages.
https://liarparadox.org/HH(DD,DD)_FULL_TRACE.pdf
HH simulates DD that calls HH that simulates DD and shows all of
the steps of the simulated HH. The execution trace of DD is mixed
in to this making it more difficult to find.

You STILL Haven't published any results that match your current definition of correct simulation.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jun 24 * At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact100olcott
5 Jun 24 +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact95Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact94olcott
5 Jun 24 i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact93Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact92olcott
5 Jun 24 i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact91Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact90olcott
5 Jun 24 i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact85Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact84olcott
5 Jun 24 i     i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
5 Jun 24 i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact82Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact81olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact79Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact78olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact76Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact75olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact74Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact73olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact72Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact71olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact70Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact69olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact68Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact67olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact66Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact65olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact64Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact57olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i+- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1wij
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact55Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact54olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact53Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard52olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard4olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard44Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard43olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard42Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard17olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i+* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard13Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard12olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard11Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard10olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii   +* Re: Last communication with Richard2Rich Yard Daemon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii   i`- Re: Last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard7Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard6olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard5Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii      +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii      i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  ii       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard3Fred. Zwarts
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  i  `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard24olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard21Alan Mackenzie
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard20olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1wij
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard15Alan Mackenzie
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i`* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)14olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard (we wish)1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure12olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure11Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i   `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure10olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i    `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure9Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure8olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure7Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i       `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure6olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i        `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure5Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i         `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure4olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i          `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure3Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i           `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     i            `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact -- closure1Richard Damon
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard2olcott
8 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    i      `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1Richard Damon
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i            i    `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --- last communication with Richard1immibis
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i            `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact6olcott
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i             `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact5Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i              +* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i              i`- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i i              `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
7 Jun 24 i     i   i i               `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
6 Jun 24 i     i   i `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
6 Jun 24 i     i   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
6 Jun 24 i     `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact4ornott
6 Jun 24 i      `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3olcott
6 Jun 24 i       +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1prescott
7 Jun 24 i       `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Richard Damon
5 Jun 24 +- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Mikko
5 Jun 24 `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact3Fred. Zwarts
5 Jun 24  `* Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact2olcott
5 Jun 24   `- Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact1Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal