Sujet : Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logicDate : 13. Jun 2024, 01:12:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4da12$1sioe$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/12/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/12/24 12:50 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/12/2024 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/11/24 11:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/11/2024 9:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 6/11/24 8:57 PM, olcott wrote:
On 6/11/2024 7:20 PM, Python wrote:
Le 12/06/2024 à 01:23, olcott a écrit :
...
It turns out that by the generic definition of a decider
what the directly executed D(D) does is not any of the
business of H.
>
LOL
>
>
There are no finite string transformations from the input
to H to the behavior of D(D), thus the behavior of D(D)
is irrelevant.
>
>
Of course there is.
>
That is exactly what the definition of a UTM is.
>
>
Unless we are as concrete as the x86 language truth slips
though the cracks of vagueness.
>
Show each step of DDD correctly simulated by HH such that
DDD terminates normally.
>
WHy? I never claimed that to be true.
>
The lack of finding a couter example doesn't prove that no counter example exists, it might just not be discovered.
>
>
On 5/29/2021 2:26 PM, olcott wrote:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.theory/c/dTvIY5NX6b4/m/cHR2ZPgPBAAJ
>
*This is still Truthmaker Maximalism*
The actual behavior of the input to H(D,D) is the truthmaker
for halt decider H.
Which is DEFINED to be the behavior of the program described by the input when directly run.
*If that was true then you could show ALL OF THE DETAILED STEPS*
*of the mapping that H(D,D) computes to derive that behavior*
*A LEAP OF FAITH DOES NOT COUNT IN THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION*
*SHOW ME THE DETAILED STEPS*
_D()
[00000cfc](01) 55 push ebp
[00000cfd](02) 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00000cff](03) 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00000d02](01) 50 push eax ; push D
[00000d03](03) 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00000d06](01) 51 push ecx ; push D
[00000d07](05) e800feffff call 00000b0c ; call H
[00000d0c](03) 83c408 add esp,+08
[00000d0f](02) 85c0 test eax,eax
[00000d11](02) 7404 jz 00000d17
[00000d13](02) 33c0 xor eax,eax
[00000d15](02) eb05 jmp 00000d1c
[00000d17](05) b801000000 mov eax,00000001
[00000d1c](01) 5d pop ebp
[00000d1d](01) c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0034) [00000d1d]
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Date | Sujet | # | | Auteur |
10 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- | 270 | | olcott |
10 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- | 267 | | Richard Damon |
11 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error | 266 | | olcott |
11 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error | 265 | | Richard Damon |
11 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error | 264 | | olcott |
11 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- Richard admits his error | 263 | | Richard Damon |
11 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 262 | | olcott |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 260 | | Richard Damon |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 259 | | olcott |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 223 | | Python |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 222 | | olcott |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 221 | | Richard Damon |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 220 | | olcott |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 219 | | Richard Damon |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 218 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 217 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 216 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 215 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 214 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 213 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 212 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 211 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 210 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 209 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 208 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 207 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 206 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 205 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 204 | | olcott |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 203 | | Richard Damon |
13 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 202 | | olcott |
14 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 201 | | Richard Damon |
14 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 172 | | olcott |
14 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- finite string transformation rules | 171 | | Richard Damon |
14 Jun 24 | H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 170 | | olcott |
14 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 169 | | Richard Damon |
14 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 168 | | olcott |
14 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 167 | | Richard Damon |
14 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 166 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 58 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 57 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 56 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 6 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 5 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 4 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 3 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 2 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 49 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) | 48 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 47 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 39 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 38 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 37 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 36 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 35 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 34 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 33 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 32 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 31 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 30 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 29 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 28 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 27 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 26 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 25 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 24 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 23 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 22 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 21 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 20 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 19 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 18 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 17 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 16 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 15 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 14 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 13 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 12 | | olcott |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 11 | | Richard Damon |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 10 | | olcott |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 9 | | Richard Damon |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 8 | | olcott |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 7 | | Richard Damon |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 6 | | olcott |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 5 | | Richard Damon |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 4 | | olcott |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 3 | | Richard Damon |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 2 | | olcott |
16 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 1 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 7 | | joes |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. | 6 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood) | 5 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood) | 2 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood) | 2 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Truth Itself is not Broken. (Just misunderstood) | 1 | | Richard Damon |
21 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply | 48 | | olcott |
21 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply | 47 | | Richard Damon |
21 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply | 44 | | olcott |
21 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply | 43 | | Richard Damon |
21 Jun 24 | Re: H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) --- Boilerplate Reply | 2 | | olcott |
22 Jun 24 | DDD correctly emulated by H0 | 59 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V2 ---ignoring all other replies | 12 | | olcott |
15 Jun 24 | H(D,D) cannot even be asked about the behavior of D(D) V3 ---IGNORING ALL OTHER REPLIES | 16 | | olcott |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 35 | | Richard Damon |
12 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 1 | | Fred. Zwarts |
10 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- | 1 | | olcott |
11 Jun 24 | Re: D correctly simulated by H proved for THREE YEARS --- rewritten | 1 | | olcott |