Re: Why do people here insist on denying these verified facts?

Am Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:24:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/25/2024 3:41 PM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 22 Jun 2024 11:18:07 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/22/2024 11:03 AM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 22 Jun 2024 10:16:18 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/22/2024 9:42 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 6/22/24 10:31 AM, olcott wrote:

Suppose DDD1 only called HHH1. How would HHH1 simulate it?

The fact that DDD calls HHH0(DDD) and does not call HHH1(DDD) changes
the behavior of DDD correctly emulated by HHH0 relative to DDD
correctly emulated by HHH1.

Those are different DDD's. All HHH's should give the same result.

DDD does not change behaviour depending on its simulator, that is an
error on the part of the simulator.

The input that calls its own simulator defines different behavior than
when it is simulated by a different simulator.

It's the other way around: the simulator that DDD calls can't simulate it.
Other simulators give the same result as when run directly. The behaviour
of DDD is fixed.
Every simulator running a program that calls that same simulator
makes a mistake.

--
Man kann mit dunklen Zahlen nicht rechnen. Für die eigentliche Mathematik
sind sie vollkommen nutzlos. --Wolfgang Mückenheim