Re: DDD correctly emulated by H0 --- Why Lie? -- Repeat until Closure

Am Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:10:36 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 6/26/2024 2:43 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

Your posts are, in the main, tedious in the extreme.  When you repeat
the same thing 30 times over, you can't expect anybody to read each of
the repetitions as though it were fresh and new.

I must keep repeating them until they bother to pay attention to the
exact words that I am exactly saying because every fake rebuttal is the
strawman deception.

That's not how it works. You should try to rephrase if you are not
understood.
A strawman is a misrepresentation. I think we understand you correctly,
if at all.

All the people you are debating with care about the truth.  That's why
they're in this group debating with you.

It seems to me that they are only here to play the troll.

This made me laugh hysterically.

Anything "like" what an x86 emulator does is insufficiently precise.

An x86 emulator is already 100% perfectly precise if the trolls that
review my work don't think so then that proves that they are trolls.

Then why do you think that emulator can abort or otherwise change the
behaviour of its input?

And the "semantics of x86" don't specify anthing beyond the meaning of
x86 programs in general.

*That is a stupid thing to say*
The semantics of the x86 language provides 100% of all of the details of
the behavior of these two functions.

There is nothing that makes this specific to x86. (Also C is not asm.)

That DDD correctly emulated by H0 must continue to repeat its first
four instructions is self-evident true to anyone knowing what an x86
emulator is and having sufficient basic knowledge of the x86
programming language.

It is not self-evident.

To anyone that is mostly clueless about the x86 language.

Who are you talking to then, if you disregard our qualifications?

The CS courses that fulfilled the requirements for a BSCS degree at my
university had quite a bit of programming. One of the projects for the
data structures course was to write a LISP interpreter that could do
car, cdr and cons.
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/eintr/car-cdr-

_0026-cons.html

I'm familiar with that page, being a member of the Emacs maintenance
team.

RIP

I haven't seen other people here lying.

When they say that I am wrong knowing that they do not understand what
I am saying this would be a lie.

It's your responsibility to make yourself clear.

--
Man kann mit dunklen Zahlen nicht rechnen. Für die eigentliche Mathematik
sind sie vollkommen nutzlos. --Wolfgang Mückenheim