Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant?

On 7/4/2024 5:13 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:19:20 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/3/2024 9:11 AM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 22:55:12 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/2/2024 10:50 PM, joes wrote:

Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott:

On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott:

On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott:

>

HHH repeats the process twice and aborts too soon.

>
DDD is correctly emulated by any HHH that can exist which calls this
emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted (which may be
never).

Whatever HHH does, it does not run forever but aborts.
>

HHH halts on input DDD.
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt.

WTF? It only calls HHH, which you just said halts.
>

An aborted simulation does not count as halting.
Reaching it own machine address 00002183 counts as halting.
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly do that.

Yes, DDD does not halt. But HHH aborts simulating it.
 

Finally someone that is not a liar.
HHH is required to abort the simulation of any
and all sequences that would never otherwise stop running.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer