Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Liar ??? Maybe...

Op 04.jul.2024 om 14:43 schreef olcott:

On 7/4/2024 2:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.jul.2024 om 05:21 schreef olcott:

On 7/3/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/3/24 10:41 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/3/2024 9:34 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 7/3/24 10:05 PM, olcott wrote:

>
You are not paying close enough attention to the exact words
that I am saying. DDD cannot possibly reach past its own
machine address 0000217a no matter what the Hell that HHH does.
>
>

>
OF course it can. HHH might not be able to simulate it getting there,

>
Because the machine instructions provided to HHH specify that
it is not possible to go there. HHH uses an x86 emulator with
two decades of development effort.

>
No, the exact same instructions that HHH used when called by main are in the presentation to HHH by DDD,

>
That is false and you are too indoctrinated to notice verified facts.
>
HHH1 and directly executed DDD(DDD) benefit from
HHH(DDD) having already aborted its simulation.
HHH cannot possibly reap this same benefit.

>
Exactly! Well done! This proves that HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself. Because it aborts too soon.
>

 Liar

Ad hominem attack as an attempt to hide that you ran out of arguments.
You could not point to any error in the reasoning.
It is a pity for you that your contributions only confirm my case.

 

>
Maybe I need to repeat this in every reply.
>

>
Yes and remember that, therefore, HHH cannot possibly correctly simulate itself.