Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 7/7/2024 1:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:I didn't ask about True(L, ~x).On 7/7/24 1:59 PM, olcott wrote:True(L,x)==false and True(L,~x)==falseOn 7/7/2024 12:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 7/7/24 9:34 AM, olcott wrote:>On 7/7/2024 6:26 AM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 7/6/24 11:42 PM, olcott wrote:>On 7/6/2024 10:12 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 7/6/24 10:51 PM, olcott wrote:>On 7/6/2024 9:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:>>>
So if x is defined in L as ~True(L, x)
>
what value does True(L, x) have?
>
then True(L,x) evaluates to false ultimately meaning
that x is incorrect.
But doesn't ~false evaluate to True?
>
No. ~false evaluates to true or incorrect.
So, "incorrect" is an ACTUAL logic state, not just "sort of" and ~~P doesn't necessarily have the same value as P.
>
It is something like tri-valued logic.
It needs to either BE tri-valued, or be bi-valued, or be whatever number of values it is.
>
True, False and IDK would be trivalued logic.
True, False and not-a-logic-sentence is not actually trivalued logic.
Is "Not-a-logic-sentence" a truth value that True, of ~false can return or not?
>
means that x is not a logic sentence.In other words, you system can't handle references.
I will stop here because you get overwhelmed.Nope, you are stopping before you dig yourself too deep, but that it too late, by not showing how you handle the problem shown, you are just admitting that you don't have a way to handle it but are just ignoring that your system is broken or very limited.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.