Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
Le 28/07/2024 à 19:07, Richard Damon a écrit :No, that is w double, what number in the first set became w?On 7/28/24 7:55 AM, WM wrote:I.Mistake! ℕ U ω = {1, 2, 3, ..., ω}>
And who was using that set?>ω*2>>>yields the set>
{2, 4, 6, ..., ω, ω+2, ω+4, ..., ω*2}.
>
Why?
See the correction.
But what number became ω when doubled?
Why not? WHich ones don't?>No.
Every natural number when doubled is a Natural Number.
Why?Note, ω-1 doesn't exist in the base transfinite numbers, just as -1 doesn't exist in the Natural Numbers, you can't go below the first element.If all natural numbers exist, then ω-1 exists.
Nope, it is not finite, but beyound the finite.>ω-1 is not transfinite but cisfinite.
But, just as we can expand the Natural Numbers to the Integers, and get negative numbers, we also might be able to define an extention to the transfinite numbers that can have a ω-1 element.
Nope, the fact that you admit that you logic breaks the definition of the Natural Numbers says you admit your logic can't be used with them.That is unavoidable. You believe in the magical appearance of infinitely many unit fractions. That breaks logic and mathematics.Using the unit fractions itelligent readers understand that there must be a first one after zero. Others must believe in the magical appearance of infinitely many unit fractions.Nope, since that implies there is a highest Natural Number, which breaks their definition,
>
Regards, WM
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.