Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On 8/3/2024 4:50 AM, Mikko wrote:So what is wrong with Quines opinion that the truth of "A bachelorOn 2024-08-02 12:19:31 +0000, olcott said:The bottom line here is that every objection that he could
On 8/2/2024 1:43 AM, Mikko wrote:What you said (quoted above) about Quine is insulting and unjustified,On 2024-07-31 14:46:17 +0000, olcott said:Try and show the details of how I am incorrect.
On 7/31/2024 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote:It is not a good idea to lie about other people.On 2024-07-30 13:40:55 +0000, olcott said:Quine got totally confused by synonymity. He never understood
On 7/30/2024 2:33 AM, Mikko wrote:You cannot redefine side wihout redefining the other side and theOn 2024-07-29 00:44:41 +0000, olcott said:https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/analytic-synthetic/
The truth about every expression of language that can be knownDoes that really mean something? If the significance of the lack of
to be true on the basis of its meaning expressed in language is
that a lack of connection simply means untrue.
connection is restricted to sentences where the connection exists
then it seems that you are talking about nothing.
I had to redefine the analytic side of the analytic/synthetic
distinction because Quine convinced most everyone that this
distinction does not exist.
distinction itself. Is your redefinition equivalent to the one
at https://plato.stanford.edu/Entries/analytic-synthetic/ or did
you find out that that distincition is not the one that exists?
that the term {Bachelor} was defined in terms of
(~Married + Adult + Male).
When reqding Quine, you should ask yourself why your presentation
is much less convincing than Quine's.
which alone is wrong.
have possibly made is addressed by this augmentation to
the definition of {analytic truth}
*Original definition* of {Analytic truth}
Every expression of (formal or natural language) that is
true on the basis of its meaning...
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.