Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable

On 8/17/2024 4:03 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/17/24 4:55 PM, olcott wrote:

>
It is more of a somewhat poorly defined process than it is a defined term.
>

 Thinks IGNORANT you.
 

The vast disagreement on very important  truths
such as climate change and election denial seems
to prove that the notion of truth lacks a process
sufficiently well defined that it is accessible
to most.

 

>
They are generally a learned-by-rote bunch. Philosophy of
logic delves into this more deeply the problem. The
learned-by-rote bunch assumes that learning by rote makes
them philosophers. They tend to push actual philosophers
out by denigrating them in the philosophy of logic spaces.
Wittgenstein had no patience with them.
>

>
No, you have your never-learned-because-of-ignorance ideas that are just incoherent.
>

>
It may seem that way from a learned-by-rote the rules-of-logic
and the "received view" are my gospel frame of reference.

 Thinks IGNORANT YOU.
 

Wittgenstein said the same thing.
Try to name any logician that has any history of
being open to critiques of the received view and
you will come up empty.

>

Your trying to ally with Wittgenstein doesn't really help you, as his ideas were not always accepted, and considered prone to error, not unlike your own.
>

>
It may seem that way from a learned-by-rote the rules-of-logic
and the "received view" are my gospel frame of reference.
>

 Thinks IGNORANT YOU.
 Your problem is you reject that logic HAS rules that need to be followed,

Just like I said a learned-by-rote view.
Not any what happens if we change this rule? POV

and thus you have put yourself out of the game, and make yourself into a LIAR by claiming to be in the game, but diqualfing youself by breaking the rules.
 

Just like I said a learned-by-rote view.
Not any what happens if we change this rule? POV

Sorry, you are just proving how STUPID and IGNORANT you are of what you talk abot.

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer