Re: This makes all Analytic(Olcott) truth computable

On 8/19/24 9:04 AM, olcott wrote:

On 8/19/2024 3:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-18 11:34:55 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 8/18/2024 5:37 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-08-17 15:47:51 +0000, olcott said:

>
Meaningless does not mean has less meaning, it is
an idiom for having zero meaning.
https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/meaningless

>
You are lying. According to that page the word "meaningless"
has two meanings. The other is 'having no real importance or value'.
>

>
My original correction to this issue would be to have an ISO
standard dictionary with standard subscripts for sense meanings.

>
Just state in the beginning your opus which dictinary gives the
correct meaning of your words. You may also state that only the
first meaning applies.
>

(3) an inaccurate or untrue statement; falsehood:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie
>
a person who tells lies.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/liar
>
When calling someone a liar most people do not assume that
you are accusing them of an honest mistake.

>
People have different tolerances about "honest". People may call you
"dishonest" or a "liar" if they regard your mistake as a consequence
of a lack of reasonable care. People also have different opinions
about "reasonable".
>

 When I specify semantic tautologies and people say that
they are lies they make themselves look either foolish
or dishonest.
 

The problem is your semantic tautologies aren't actually tautologies when we consider the meaning you are putting into words.
The conditions of the tautology need to be possible for it to be meaningful.
Talking about correctly emulationg a program FRAGMENT is just nonsense.